blob: 3953a68be07921b43e25df0afb1879cea4fd46db [file] [log] [blame]
Note: the debugging interface is under development. Please do not make
changes to it yet as I will do major changes in the next few weeks.
To make my life easier, PLEASE follow the guidelines described in
this document. If you have some ideas that you would like to
incorporate, please contact me first.
Please read the document before writing new code.
Also, DO NOT USE fprintf (or printf) to output things. All these
will have to be translated to dprintf_ calls and there are already
about 3000 of them! Also, instead of writing FIXMEs in the source,
output a dprintf_fixme message. But read on...
25 Feb 1998, Dimitrie O. Paun <dimi@cs.toronto.edu>
Debugging classes
-----------------
The debugging messages are divided into 4 classes:
fixme -- Messages in this class relate to behavior of Wine that does
not correspond to standard Windows behavior and that should
be fixed.
Examples: stubs, semi-implemented features, etc.
err -- Messages in this class relate to serious errors in Wine.
This sort of messages are close to asserts -- that is,
you should output a 'err' message when the code detects a
condition which should not happen.
Examples: unexpected change in internal state, etc.
warn -- This are warning messages. You should report a warning when
something unwanted happen but the function behaves properly.
That is, output a warning when you encounter something
unexpected (ex: could not open a file) but the function deals
correctly with the situation (that is, according to the docs).
If you do not deal correctly with it, output a fixme.
Examples: fail to access a resource required by the app, etc.
info -- This are detailed debugging messages that are mainly useful
to debug a component. This are usually turned off.
Examples: everything else that does not fall in one of the
above mentioned categories and the user does not
need to know about it. This sort of messages simply
outputs something about the state of some component
that is of interest mainly to the developer of that
component.
We will refer to a generic class as yyy.
The user has the capability to turn on or off messages in a particular
class. You can expect the following patters of usage (but note that
any combination is possible):
-- when you debug a component, all classes (info,warn,err,fixme)
will be enabled.
-- during the pre-alpha (maybe alpha) stage of Wine, most likely
the info class will be disabled by default, but all others
(warn,err,fixme) will be enabled by default.
-- when Wine will become stable, most likely the info and warn
classes will be disabled by default, but all err and fixme
will be enabled by default.
-- in some installations that want the smallest footprint
and where the debug information is of no interest,
all classes may be disabled by default.
Of course, the user will have the runtime ability to override these
defaults. However, this ability may be turned off and certain classes
of messages may be completely disabled at compile time to reduce the
size of Wine.
Debugging channels
------------------
Also, we divide the debugging messages per component. Each component
is assigned a debugging channel (or type). The identifier of the
channel must be a valid C identifier but note that it may also be a
reserve word like int or static.
Examples of debugging channels/types:
reg, updown, string
We will refer to a generic channel as xxx.
Note: for those who know the old interface, the channel/type is
what followed the _ in the dprintf_xxx statements.
For example, to output a message on the debugging channel
reg in the old interface you would have to write:
dprintf_reg(stddeb, "Could not access key!\n");
In the new interface, we drop the stddeb as it is implicit.
However, we add an orthogonal piece of information to the
message: its class. This is very important as it will allow
us to selectively turn on or off certain messages based on
type of information they report. For this reason it is VERY
important to choose the right class for the message.
Anyhow, suppose we figured that this message should belong
in the warn class, so in the new interface, you write:
dprintf_warn(reg, "Could not access key!\n");
---
How to use it
-------------
So, to output a message (class yyy) on channel xxx, do:
#include "debug.h"
....
dprintf_yyy(xxx, "<message>", ...);
Some examples from the code:
#include "debug.h"
...
dprintf_info(crtdll,
"CRTDLL_setbuf(file %p buf %p)\n",
file, buf);
dprintf_warn(aspi, "Error opening device errno=%d\n", save_error);
If you need to declare a new debugging channel, do:
%tools/make_debug
in the root directory of Wine.
Note that this will result in almost complete recompilation of Wine.
Notes:
1. Please pay attention to which class you assign the message.
It is very, Very, VERY important to get the class right.
There are only 4 classes, so it is not hard. The reason
it is important to get it right is that too much information
is no information. For example, if you put things into the
warn class that should really be in the info class, the
output will be too big and this will force the user to
turn of warnings. But this way he will fail to see the important
ones. Also, if you put warnings into the info class lets say,
he will most likely miss those because usually the info class
is turned off. A similar argument can be made if you mix any
other two classes.
2. ALL LINES MUST END WITH A NEWLINE!!! If you can NOT output
everything that you want in the line with only one dprintf_xxx
statement, then you need to build the string in memory.
Please read the section below "In-memory messages" on the
preferred way to do it. PLEASE USE THAT INTERFACE TO BUILD
MESSAGES IN MEMORY. The reason is that we are not sure that
we like it and having everything in one format will facilitate
the (automatic) translation to a better interface.
Are we debugging?
-----------------
To test whether the debugging output of class yyy on channel xxx is
enabled, do:
debugging_yyy(xxx)
Examples:
if(debugging_info(atom)){
...blah...
}
In-memory messages
------------------
If you NEED to build the message from multiple calls, you need to
build it in memory. To do that, you should use the following
interface:
- declare a string (where you are allowed to declare C variables)
as follows:
dbg_decl_str(name, len);
where name is the name of the string (you should use the channel
name on which you are going to output it)
- print in it with:
dsprintf(name, "<message>", ...);
which is just like a sprintf function but instead of a C string as
first parameter it takes the name you used to declare it.
- obtain a pointer to the string with:
dbg_str(name)
- reset the string (if you want to reuse it with):
dbg_reset_str(name);
Example (modified from the code):
void some_func(tabs)
{
INT32 i;
LPINT16 p = (LPINT16)tabs;
dbg_decl_str(listbox, 256); /* declare the string */
for (i = 0; i < descr->nb_tabs; i++) {
descr->tabs[i] = *p++<<1;
if(debugging_info(listbox)) /* write in it only if
dsprintf(listbox, "%hd ", descr->tabs[i]); /* we are gonna output it */
}
dprintf_info(listbox, "Listbox %04x: settabstops %s\n",
wnd->hwndSelf, dbg_str(listbox)); /* output the whole thing */
}
If you need to use it two times in the same scope do like this:
void some_func(tabs)
{
INT32 i;
LPINT16 p = (LPINT16)tabs;
dbg_decl_str(listbox, 256); /* declare the string */
for (i = 0; i < descr->nb_tabs; i++) {
descr->tabs[i] = *p++<<1;
if(debugging_info(listbox)) /* write in it only if
dsprintf(listbox, "%hd ", descr->tabs[i]); /* we are gonna output it */
}
dprintf_info(listbox, "Listbox %04x: settabstops %s\n",
wnd->hwndSelf, dbg_str(listbox)); /* output the whole thing */
dbg_reset_str(listbox); /* !!!reset the string!!! */
for (i = 0; i < descr->extrainfo_nr; i++) {
descr->extrainfo = *p+1;
if(debugging_info(listbox)) /* write in it only if
dsprintf(listbox,"%3d ",descr->extrainfo); /* we are gonna output it */
}
dprintf_info(listbox, "Listbox %04x: extrainfo %s\n",
wnd->hwndSelf, dbg_str(listbox)); /* output the whole thing */
}
IMPORTANT NOTE:
As I already stated, I do not think this will be the ultimate interface
for building in-memory debugging messages. In fact, I do have better ideas
which I hope to have time to implement for the next release. For this
reason, please try not to use it. However, if you need to output a line
in more than one dprintf_xxx calls, then USE THIS INTERFACE. DO NOT use
other methods. This way, I will easily translate everything to the new
interface (when it will become available). So, if you need to use if,
then follow the following guidelines:
-- wrap calls to dsprintf with a
if(debugging_yyy(xxx))
dsprintf(xxx,...);
Of course, if the call to dsprintf is made from within a function
which you know is called only if debugging_yyy(xxx) is true
(say you call it only like this:
if(debugging_yyy(xxx))
print_some_debug_info();
)
then you need not (and should not) wrap calls to dsprintf with
the before mentioned if.
-- name the string EXACTLY like the debugging channel on which
is going to be output. Please see the above example.
Resource identifiers
--------------------
Resource identifiers can be either strings or numbers. To make life a bit
easier for outputting this beasts (and to help you avoid the need to build
the message in memory), I introduced a new function called:
debugres
The function is defined in debugstr.h
and has the following prototype:
LPSTR debugres(const void *id);
It takes a pointer to the resource id and returns a nicely formatted
string of the identifier.
It the high word of the pointer is 0, then it assumes that the
identifier is a number and thus returns a string of the form:
#xxxx
where xxxx are 4 hex-digits representing the low word of id.
It the high word of the pointer is not 0, then it assumes that the
identifier is a string and thus returns a string of the form:
'<identifier>'
Thus, to use it, do something on the following lines:
#include "debugstr.h"
...
dprintf_yyy(xxx, "resource is %s", debugres(myresource));
The -debugmsg command line option
---------------------------------
So, the -debugmsg command line option has been changed as follows:
- the new syntax is: -debugmsg [yyy]#xxx[,[yyy1]#xxx1]*
where # is either + or -
- when the optional class argument (yyy) is not present,
then the statement will enable(+)/disable(-) all messages for
the given channel (xxx) on all classes. For example:
-debugmsg +reg,-file
enables all messages on the reg channel and disables all
messages on the file channel.
This is very close (actually identical) to the old semantics.
- when the optional class argument (yyy) is present,
then the statement will enable(+)/disable(-) messages for
the given channel (xxx) only on the given class. For example:
-debugmsg info+reg,warn-file
enables info messages on the reg channel and disables warning
messages on the file channel.
- also, the pseudo-channel all is also supported and it has the
intuitive semantics:
-debugmsg +all -- enables all debug messages
-debugmsg -all -- disables all debug messages
-debugmsg yyy+all -- enables debug messages for class yyy on all
channels.
-debugmsg yyy-all -- disables debug messages for class yyy on all
channels.
So, for example:
-debugmsg warn-all -- disables all warning messages.
Also, note that at the moment:
- the fixme, err, warn classes are all enabled by default
- the info class is disabled by default
- there is no way to compile out the messages. All are
runtime configurable. This will come next release.